Not legally binding? We helped you analyze the SEC’s latest cryptographic monetary framework guidance.

Of course, for cryptographic practitioners and legal experts, the Securities and Exchange Commission’s guidance on the issuance of cryptographic monetary frameworks has, to some extent, increased regulatory transparency and is a positive step forward in regulation. At the same time, however, there is a consensus in the industry that the framework guidance does not clearly define some conceptual definitions, that there are still no clear rule requirements in some key areas, and that many issues remain to be discussed, such as the scope of application of the cryptographic guidance, what benefits start-ups can derive from the framework, and so on

It is also a common feeling among lawyers and regulatory experts in the blockchain industry.

Yes, the Securities and Exchange Commission’s release of the cryptographic monetary framework guidance is just the beginning. As early as six months ago, William Hinman, head of corporate finance William Hinman the Securities and Exchange Commission, claimed to develop new cryptographic framework guidance and wanted to use easy-to-understand language to give cryptographic startups a better understanding of regulatory ideas and help them determine whether their products would be identified as securities.

Dapp data report: transaction flow reached 3.6 billion US dollars

From the perspective of the number of users, although EOS and TRON seem to have more than 50,000 daily users, there are a large number of wool and brush accounts. In the second part of the data report, we use some dimension filtering to restore real users. Volume, DappReview believes that “after filtering according to the daily transaction amount as a threshold, it can more realistically reflect the actual number of active users in each chain.” Under this rule, the daily users of each chain are between 3000 and 6000.